香港专业教育出版社（HKPEP）教育信息研究院今日正式发布《2025HKPEP全球最具教育竞争力国际学校100强》榜单。
HKPEP凭借着连续十二年出版发布中国香港最具教育竞争力中学/小学/幼稚园/国际学校排名榜选校指南书籍的专业权威，自前年发布业界首份全球国际学校百强榜单之后，连续三年重磅发布2025全球最新榜单。相比前两年，今年中国国际学校在全球排名中整体大幅下降，主因是美国高校对留学生政策的调整，录取政策偏向“自己人”导致常春藤及传统名校等纷纷收紧留学生录取比率，造成中国留学生被常春藤等名校录取的人数和比率降低，除此之外，美国政府限制中国留学生修读理工科课程政策也是原因之一。
本次教育竞争力评选指标是基于联合国教育、科学及文化组织出版的统计年鉴有关国际通用的教育指标，采用“教育投入——教育过程——教育成效”的评比架构（具体的国际学校教育竞争力评选体系及其一级、二级、三级共63项教育指标说明以及评比资料的处理方式和如何计算排名请登录www.hkpep.com查看）。
在评选的过程中，香港专业教育出版社（HKPEP）教育信息研究院共收集了全球1500所以上可修读英美加及IB国际课程的学校资料，进行了综合比较分析评估。此全球排名的评选体系是在HKPEP中国最具教育竞争力国际学校排名评选体系的基础上增设了学校国际化程度指标，极具独特的参考价值，为中国具有国际化教育需求家庭择校提供重要参考，进一步促进学校教育竞争力提升。
本次榜单竞争激烈，相比去年，有17所学校跌出百强，其中包括中国大陆的5所，今年上榜的国家地区共有21个，其中，美国学校占据34所；英国学校增加5所占据27所；中国学校上榜名单下降至19所，包括香港6所，大陆13所，其中北京3所，上海5所，广州、深圳、武汉、南京、佛山各1所；新加坡学校占据4所；印度及阿联酋各2所；加拿大首次上榜，占据1所，马来西亚、日本、澳大利亚、瑞士、俄罗斯、比利时、韩国、西班牙、意大利、法国、捷克、德国、摩纳哥各1所。（有关入榜学校的各项教育指标评级以及综合评级和解读请登录www.goodschool.world查看）
此份榜单将全球具有可修读国际课程的学校进行了综合评估，然而即使是最终的综合得分，也不是各学校教育综合力排名的“风云榜”，更不是对各学校教育竞争力大小强弱的判决，而只是竞争力监测的一个“体检表”。每一所学校都可以当其为一面镜子，不妨看一看自己，也可以比一比别人。但不必依此而自傲或者因此而自悲，也不必据此而张扬或者为此而抱怨。如果所有的学校特别是优秀学校，都能以豁达之心听之，以借鉴之心视之，以求真之心析之，以自审之心用之，那么，我们这项全球国际学校教育竞争力监测工作就能实现其最大的价值，成为广大家长们选校和教育工作者的参考指南。具体榜单排名如下：
Released!
The Education Information Institute of Hong Kong Professional Education Press (HKPEP), on today, has officially released the "HKPEP Top 100 Global International Schools in Education Competitiveness 2025" list.
The Hong Kong Professional Education Press (HKPEP) has been the professional authority for publishing the guidebooks on the ranking of Hong Kong's most competitive secondary/primary/kindergarten/international schools for the 12th consecutive year. This is the third consecutive year that the 2025 global latest list has been released with great weight since HKPEP released the industry's first global top 100 international schools list the year before last. Compared with the previous two years, Chinese international schools have generally dropped significantly in the global rankings this year. The main reason is the adjustment of the policies for international students by American colleges and universities. The admission policy is biased towards "their own people", leading to Ivy League and traditional famous schools tightening the admission ratio for international students one after another. As a result, the number and ratio of Chinese international students admitted to Ivy League and other famous schools have decreased. In addition, the US government's policy of restricting Chinese international students from taking science and engineering courses is also one of the reasons.
based on the internationally applicable education indicators in UNESCO Statistical Yearbook, the assessment structure "Education Input - Process - Effectiveness" is adopted. (please visit www.hkpep.com for the details on assessment system, the explanations of 63 education indicators at level 1, level 2 and level 3, and how to process the evaluation data and calculate the rankings).
During the evaluation process, the Education Information Institute of Hong Kong Professional Education Press (HKPEP) collected data from more than 1,500 schools around the world that can offer international curriculums such as those of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and IB, and conducted comprehensive comparative analysis and evaluation. The evaluation system for this global ranking is based on the evaluation system for the most educationally competitive international schools in China by HKPEP, with the addition of indicators for the degree of internationalization of schools. It is of extremely unique reference value and provides an important reference for Chinese families with international education needs when choosing schools, further promoting the improvement of school educational competitiveness.
The competition for this list is fierce. Compared with last year, 17 schools have dropped out of the top 100, including 5 from mainland China. There are 21 countries and regions on the list this year. Among them, American schools account for 34; British schools have increased by 5 and account for 27; the number of Chinese schools on the list has dropped to 19, including 6 in Hong Kong and 13 in mainland China, among which there are 3 in Beijing, 5 in Shanghai, and 1 each in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Wuhan, Nanjing, and Foshan; Singaporean schools account for 4; India and the United Arab Emirates each have 2; Canada is on the list for the first time and accounts for 1. Malaysia, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, Russia, Belgium, South Korea, Spain, Italy, France, Czech Republic, Germany, and Monaco each have 1. (For the rating of various educational indicators and comprehensive ratings and interpretations of the listed schools, please visit www.goodschool.world.)...
This list has conducted a comprehensive evaluation of schools around the world that offer international curriculums. However, even the final comprehensive score is not a "ranking list" for the comprehensive educational strength of each school, nor is it a judgment on the strength of educational competitiveness of each school. Instead, it is just a "physical examination form" for competitiveness monitoring. Each school can take it as a mirror to look at itself and compare with others. But there is no need to be proud or feel sad because of it, nor is there a need to be ostentatious or complain about it. If all schools, especially excellent schools, can listen to it with an open mind, view it with a learning mind, analyze it with a truth-seeking mind, and use it with a self-examining mind, then our global international school educational competitiveness monitoring work can achieve its greatest value and become a reference guide for educators and parents when choosing schools. The specific list rankings are as follows:
1、北京师范大学附属实验中学（国际部）
